QUORUM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 3-11-0449 (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20140910c19
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the plaintiff intervenor United Tort Claimants ("UTC") has notified the Court that a settlement has been reached between the UTC and defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company ("Ironshore"). As a result, the following motions are rendered MOOT and the Clerk is directed to terminate them as pending motions: 1. The motion filed by the UTC for judgment on the pleadings against Ironshore (Docket Entry No. 154); 2. The motion to strike ans
Summary: ORDER JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the plaintiff intervenor United Tort Claimants ("UTC") has notified the Court that a settlement has been reached between the UTC and defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company ("Ironshore"). As a result, the following motions are rendered MOOT and the Clerk is directed to terminate them as pending motions: 1. The motion filed by the UTC for judgment on the pleadings against Ironshore (Docket Entry No. 154); 2. The motion to strike answ..
More
ORDER
JULIET GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge.
Counsel for the plaintiff intervenor United Tort Claimants ("UTC") has notified the Court that a settlement has been reached between the UTC and defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company ("Ironshore").
As a result, the following motions are rendered MOOT and the Clerk is directed to terminate them as pending motions:
1. The motion filed by the UTC for judgment on the pleadings against Ironshore (Docket Entry No. 154);
2. The motion to strike answer or for a more definite statement filed by the UTC against Ironshore (Docket Entry No. 161); and
3. The motion of the UTC for permission to file reply (Docket Entry No. 176).
Although counsel for the UTC advised that the motion filed by the UTC for a hearing (Docket Entry No. 220) is also rendered moot, in that motion the UTC requested a hearing on the pending motions for judgment on the pleadings against both Ironshore and defendant Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"), and the Court assumes that the UTC still requests a hearing on the motion for judgment on the pleadings against Lexington.
Therefore, the motion for a hearing will remain pending as it relates to the motion for judgment on the pleadings against defendant Lexington.
It is so ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. There are no longer any claims asserted by CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. and Triad Healthcare Corporation as originally asserted in the lead case (3-11-0449). See Fourth Amended Consolidated Complaint filed May 15, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 194). Although technically case no. 3-11-0449 should be closed, closing that case and only using 3-12-0248 in the future would present an administrative nightmare. Therefore, the lead case will remain 3-11-0449 and all filings and entries shall continue to be made in 3-11-0449.
Source: Leagle
