Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jeffrey Scott Watson, 12-14786 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-14786 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14786 Date Filed: 06/03/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14786 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cr-60107-WJZ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEFFREY SCOTT WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 3, 2013) Before BARKETT, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin Farnsworth, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 12-14786    Date Filed: 06/03/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-14786
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                      D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cr-60107-WJZ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

JEFFREY SCOTT WATSON,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                  (June 3, 2013)

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Robin Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Watson in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 18
              Case: 12-14786    Date Filed: 06/03/2013   Page: 2 of 
2 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Watson’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer