Filed: Mar. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (collectively, the "Parties") have, in an effort to resolve this matter and Vergara v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-cv-06942 (N.D. Ill.) (Durkin, J.), another putative TCPA class action pending in the Northern District of Illinoi
Summary: STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (collectively, the "Parties") have, in an effort to resolve this matter and Vergara v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-cv-06942 (N.D. Ill.) (Durkin, J.), another putative TCPA class action pending in the Northern District of Illinois..
More
STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (collectively, the "Parties") have, in an effort to resolve this matter and Vergara v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 15-cv-06942 (N.D. Ill.) (Durkin, J.), another putative TCPA class action pending in the Northern District of Illinois against Uber (collectively, the "Cases"), agreed to attend a mediation for the two Cases with the Honorable Layn R. Phillips on May 23, 2017;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that rather than enter into an indefinite stay, it would be preferable to modify the deadlines in this matter to ensure that it proceed efficiently should the Parties be unable to arrive at a resolution via mediation;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that Uber will provide responses to outstanding discovery requests issued by Plaintiffs prior to entering into this Stipulation;
WHEREAS, the proposed modification to the deadlines in this matter would result in only a seven-week adjustment to the hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification;
THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree that the case schedule should be amended as follows:
Event Current Deadline Amended Deadline
Mediation with Hon. Layn August 1, 2017 (mediation May 23, 2017 (mediation to take
Phillips (Corona Del Mar, CA) deadline) place)
Deposition of Plaintiffs' expert N/A Weeks of May 29, 2017 and June
witnesses 5, 2017
Defendant's expert designation March 17, 2017 June 9, 2017
Plaintiffs' motion for class April 27, 2017 June 26, 2017
certification
Defendant's opposition to class June 2, 2017 August 1, 2017
certification
Plaintiffs' reply to motion for June 23, 2017 August 22, 2017
class certification
Hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for July 20, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. September 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.
class certification
Mediation deadline August 1, 2017 No change
Deadline to file dispositive 60 days after the order on No change
motions class certification
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The amended case schedule is as follows:
Event Current Deadline Amended Deadline
Mediation with Hon. Layn August 1, 2017 (mediation May 23, 2017 (mediation to take
Phillips (Corona Del Mar, CA) deadline) place)
Deposition of Plaintiffs' expert N/A Weeks of May 29, 2017 and June
witnesses 5, 2017
Defendant's expert designation March 17, 2017 June 9, 2017
Plaintiffs' motion for class April 27, 2017 June 26, 2017
certification
Defendant's opposition to class June 2, 2017 August 1, 2017
certification
Plaintiffs' reply to motion for June 23, 2017 August 22, 2017
class certification
Hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for July 20, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. September 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.
class certification September 14
Mediation deadline August 1, 2017 No change
Deadline to file dispositive 60 days after the order on No change
motions class certification
