WIRTH v. COLVIN, 14-cv-00703-AP. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140619860
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Chris R. Noel John F. Walsh 4845 Pearl East Circle, Ste 101 United States Attorney Boulder, Colorado 80301-6113 303-449-6503 J. Benedict Garcia chrisildar@comcast.net
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Chris R. Noel John F. Walsh 4845 Pearl East Circle, Ste 101 United States Attorney Boulder, Colorado 80301-6113 303-449-6503 J. Benedict Garcia chrisildar@comcast.net ..
More
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
Chris R. Noel John F. Walsh
4845 Pearl East Circle, Ste 101 United States Attorney
Boulder, Colorado 80301-6113
303-449-6503 J. Benedict Garcia
chrisildar@comcast.net Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
S/Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294
(303) 844-7237
Thayne.warner@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint was filed: March 7, 2014
B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney's Office: March 21, 2014
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: May 15, 2014
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Plaintiff states that the administrative record is presumed to be complete.
Defendant, to the best of his knowledge, states that the administrative record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff states that additional evidence may be required because the ALJ did not develop the evidence of Plaintiff's learning disorder. Records from CSU Psychological Services are being sought today.
Defendant does not intend to submit additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
Plaintiff states there are no unusual claims or defenses.
Defendant, to the best of his knowledge, does not believe the cases raises unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on appeal from any other remanding court.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiff's opening brief due July 29, 2014
B. Defendant's response brief due August 29, 2014
C. Plaintiff's reply brief due September 15, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 6.1(E) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
Source: Leagle
