SCHULTZ v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., 2:16-cv-00427-MMD-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160826f22
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO JPMORGAN ONLY MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Vanessa Schultz and Defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. DBA CHASE ("Chase Bank"), hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to, Chase Bank. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, prejudgment interest, and costs of suit
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO JPMORGAN ONLY MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Vanessa Schultz and Defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. DBA CHASE ("Chase Bank"), hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to, Chase Bank. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, prejudgment interest, and costs of suit...
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO JPMORGAN ONLY
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff Vanessa Schultz and Defendant CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued as JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. DBA CHASE ("Chase Bank"), hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to, Chase Bank. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, prejudgment interest, and costs of suit.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
