United States v. Wright, 2:14-cr-357-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190830761
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY [ECF No. 423] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Brian Wright moved for an order to stay his transfer to prison until his pending motions for return of property are decided. ECF No. 423. I understand that Wright has already been transferred to a prison in Victorville, California. Therefore, his motion is moot. Even if the motion is not moot, there is no reason to stay Wright's transfer. The motions for return of property (ECF Nos. 424, 428) are refe
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY [ECF No. 423] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Brian Wright moved for an order to stay his transfer to prison until his pending motions for return of property are decided. ECF No. 423. I understand that Wright has already been transferred to a prison in Victorville, California. Therefore, his motion is moot. Even if the motion is not moot, there is no reason to stay Wright's transfer. The motions for return of property (ECF Nos. 424, 428) are refer..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY
[ECF No. 423]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant Brian Wright moved for an order to stay his transfer to prison until his pending motions for return of property are decided. ECF No. 423. I understand that Wright has already been transferred to a prison in Victorville, California. Therefore, his motion is moot.
Even if the motion is not moot, there is no reason to stay Wright's transfer. The motions for return of property (ECF Nos. 424, 428) are referred to Magistrate Judge Ferenbach. If Judge Ferenbach needs to have Wright physically present in court for any reason (e.g., if a video connection is not feasible), he can order Wright returned to Nevada.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Wright's motion to stay (ECF No. 423) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
