Ridola v. C & L WU, LLC, 17-cv-06564-SK. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180822951
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 25. SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 25. SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing O..
More
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 25.
SALLIE KIM, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
Source: Leagle
