Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Antiaging Institute of California, Inc. v. Solonova, LLC, CV-15-03416 AB (FFMx). (2017)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20170303893 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2017
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ANDR BIROTTE, Jr. , District Judge . A. Trademark Applications 1. Plaintiff hereby abandons its applications with the U.S. Pantent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") seeking to trademark "LiquiCalcium" (Serial No. 86507597), and "LiquiCalcium 6 Plus" (Serial No. 86513049). 2. Plaintiff and its officers, agents, directors, and employees, or affiliates, whether acting directly or indirectly, shall immediately take all actions necessary to withdraw the
More

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

A. Trademark Applications

1. Plaintiff hereby abandons its applications with the U.S. Pantent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") seeking to trademark "LiquiCalcium" (Serial No. 86507597), and "LiquiCalcium 6 Plus" (Serial No. 86513049).

2. Plaintiff and its officers, agents, directors, and employees, or affiliates, whether acting directly or indirectly, shall immediately take all actions necessary to withdraw the above mentioned applications with prejudice, and shall not seek to file any new trademark applications that have any substantial similarity to the Mark.

3. Plaintiff and its officers, agents, directors, and employees, or affiliates, whether acting directly or indirectly, are hereby permanently enjoined from any use of the marks "LiquiCalcium," "LiquiCalcium 6 Plus," "LIQUI-CALCIUM" (the "Marks") or any mark that is substantially similar to the Marks.

4. Plaintiff and its officers, agents, directors, and employees, or affiliates, whether acting directly or indirectly, shall not oppose Tishcon's application to trademark "LIQUI-CALCIUM" (Serial No. 86715779), and shall take all reasonably necessary actions within Plaintiff's or its employees, agents, directors, employees or affiliate's control, to remove any existing opposition to or suspension of Tishcon's application.

B. Dismissal of Claims

5. Plaintiff hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims against Defendants, their employees, directors, officers, agents, or successors and assigns, contained in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 75).

6. Subject to the right to enforce the provisions of Paragraphs 1 through 4 hereof, Tishcon hereby dismisses all claims against Plaintiff, their employees, directors, officers, agents, or successors and assigns, contained in Tishcon's counterclaims contained in the answer to the FAC (Dkt. No. 103).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer