MARKER v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, C09-05956 RMW. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140619838
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: PARTIES STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO STRIKE THE ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF RICHARD D. NORTH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE #6 AND ATTACHMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff') and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: (1) The copy of Exhibit A , sole attachment to the original Declaration of Richard D.
Summary: PARTIES STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO STRIKE THE ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF RICHARD D. NORTH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE #6 AND ATTACHMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff') and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: (1) The copy of Exhibit A , sole attachment to the original Declaration of Richard D. ..
More
PARTIES STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO STRIKE THE ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF RICHARD D. NORTH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE #6 AND ATTACHMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff MERCEDES MARKER ("Plaintiff') and defendants CITY OF SAN JOSE and SON VU ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
(1) The copy of Exhibit A, sole attachment to the original Declaration of Richard D. North in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #6, filed February 7, 2014 ("Original Declaration/Exhibit"), was, by inadvertence and mistake, incompletely redacted at the time of filing.
(2) The Exhibit A attached to the Amended Declaration of Richard D. North in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #6, filed herewith on February 11, 2014 ("Amended Exhibit"), is fully redacted and shall replace the Original Exhibit.
(3) The Parties have a mutual interest in ensuring that confidential information is appropriately redacted from documents filed with the Court and agree that no penalty, sanction or consequence shall result from the substitution of the Amended Declaration and Exhibit for the Original Declaration and Exhibit.
(4) The Parties respectfully request that the Courl strike the Original Declaration and Exhibit from the Court's record of the above-captioned case.
Respectfully submitted.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Parties' stipulation above and hereby approves.
(1) The Declaration of Richard D. North in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #6 and attached Exhibit A, filed February 7, 2014, shall be stricken from the Court's record of Marker v. City of San Jose, Case No: C09-05956 RMW.(Docket #103)
(2) The Amended Declaration of Richard D. North in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #6 and attached Exhibit A, filed February 11, 2014, shall be accepted by the Court.
Source: Leagle
