Filed: Dec. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and non-Parties Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe (collectively "Objectors"), by their counsel Jeffrey L. Bornstein, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On October 1, 2017, Objectors Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe filed a motion to quash the subpoena Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued on August 25, 2017, to Google, Inc. (Dkt. 8). Ilya
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and non-Parties Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe (collectively "Objectors"), by their counsel Jeffrey L. Bornstein, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On October 1, 2017, Objectors Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe filed a motion to quash the subpoena Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued on August 25, 2017, to Google, Inc. (Dkt. 8). Ilyas..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov, by his counsel Martha Boersch, and non-Parties Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe (collectively "Objectors"), by their counsel Jeffrey L. Bornstein, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On October 1, 2017, Objectors Pavel Prosyankin and John Doe filed a motion to quash the subpoena Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore issued on August 25, 2017, to Google, Inc. (Dkt. 8). Ilyas Khrapunov applied for that subpoena pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782.
2. After briefing and oral argument on the motion to quash, Judge Westmore issued an order on November 22, 2017, granting in part and denying in part the Objectors' motion to quash. In the order, she granted the Objectors 15 days in which to file a motion in this Court for relief from her order. (Dkt. 29).
3. On December 6, 2017, the Objectors filed a Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Order of Magistrate Judge concurrently with an Administrative Motion to Augment Record and Set Briefing Schedule. (Dkts. 32 and 33). The Objectors have noticed March 1, 2018, as the hearing date for their motions.
4. The parties have conferred and have agreed to the following briefing schedule:
• Applicant Khrapunov's responses shall be filed on or before January 24, 2018.
• Any replies by the Objectors shall be filed on or before February 14, 2018.
5. This stipulated briefing schedule is sought due to the press of other matters. The proposed briefing schedule does not alter the noticed hearing date.
6. The proposed briefing schedule also does not alter the Stay issued by the Magistrate Judge in her November 22, 2017, order, which Objectors have argued should remain in effect for 10 days following a dispositive ruling by this Court on Objectors' Motion for De Novo Determination.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, Applicant Ilyas Khrapunov's oppositions to the Motion for De Novo Review and Administrative Motion to Augment Record and Set Briefing Schedule is due on or before January 24, 2018. Any replies by the Objectors shall be filed on or before February 14, 2018. This Order does not alter the Stay issued by the Magistrate Judge in her November 22, 2017, order (Dkt. 29), which shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
