Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC v. Reed Hein & Associations, LLC, 2:17-cv-03007-APG-VCF. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200303d47 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Order Denying Motions as Moot [ECF Nos. 110, 123] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . In light of the second amended complaint (ECF No. 157), I ORDER that defendant Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, P.S.'s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 110) and plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 123) are DENIED as moot because these motions relate to the first amended complaint.

Order Denying Motions as Moot

[ECF Nos. 110, 123]

In light of the second amended complaint (ECF No. 157),

I ORDER that defendant Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, P.S.'s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 110) and plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 123) are DENIED as moot because these motions relate to the first amended complaint.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer