Klotz v. Saul, 2:17-cv-453. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20190923b68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On September 4, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends affirming the Commissioner's decision because it is supported by substantial evidence and the corr
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On September 4, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends affirming the Commissioner's decision because it is supported by substantial evidence and the corre..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE
ROBERT J. SHELBY, Chief District Judge.
The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B),1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019.2 On September 4, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation.3 Judge Romero recommends affirming the Commissioner's decision because it is supported by substantial evidence and the correct legal standards were applied.4 Neither party objects to Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, so the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.5
Having carefully considered Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error. The court therefore ADOPTS Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation.6 The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Dkt. 22.
2. Dkt. 33.
3. Dkt. 37.
4. Id. at 13.
5. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court for N. Dist. of Cal., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879).
6. Dkt. 37.
Source: Leagle
