Filed: Jun. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter " Geo Vector ," or " Plaintiff, ") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (" SEC "), and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (" SEA ") (collectively, " Samsung ," or " Defendants ") by their respective counsel. 1 RECITALS 1. On May 5, 201
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter " Geo Vector ," or " Plaintiff, ") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (" SEC "), and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (" SEA ") (collectively, " Samsung ," or " Defendants ") by their respective counsel. 1 RECITALS 1. On May 5, 2016..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter "Geo Vector," or "Plaintiff,") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("SEC"), and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. ("SEA") (collectively, "Samsung," or "Defendants") by their respective counsel.1
RECITALS
1. On May 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed an Original Complaint in the instant action.
2. On May 6, 2016, the Court scheduled the initial case management conference for August 3, 2016.
3. On May 13, 2016, Plaintiff served SEA with the Summons and Original Complaint.
4. On June 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint.
5. Plaintiff agreed to an extension of time for the Defendants to respond to the Complaint by 90 days in exchange for SEC's agreement to accept or otherwise waive service of the Summons and Complaint such that Defendants' response to the First Amended Complaint is due on the same date.
6. Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California allows the parties to stipulate, without a court order, to extend the time within which to respond to a complaint, provided that the extension will not alter the dates of any events or deadlines already set by the Court; and
7. Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) requires that any such stipulations be promptly filed with the Court.
STIPULATION
The parties agree that (i) the Case Management Conference should be continued from August 3, 2016 to September 14, 2016, or any other date suitable for the Court that is after the Defendants file their answer, and (ii) the Case Management Statement is due one week prior to the rescheduled Case Management Conference.
The parties also agree that the undersigned Mr. Dan Girdwood hereby accepts service on behalf of all named defendants listed in the First Amended Complaint that has been filed by Plaintiff.2
The parties also agree that all named defendants may have an extension of time through September 2, 2016 to file a response to the First Amended Complaint.
ORDER
The case management conference set for August 3, 2016 is now set for September 14, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu and the Case Management Statement is due on September 7, 2016.
