Hernandez v. Starbucks Coffee Company, 2:17-cv-6927 DSF (GJSx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190927991
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2019
Summary: AMENDED JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . The above-entitled action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Dale S Fischer, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Erica Hernandez take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and the defendant Starbucks Corporation, erroneously sued as Starbucks Coffee
Summary: AMENDED JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . The above-entitled action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Dale S Fischer, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Erica Hernandez take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and the defendant Starbucks Corporation, erroneously sued as Starbucks Coffee C..
More
AMENDED JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58)
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
The above-entitled action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Dale S Fischer, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Erica Hernandez take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and the defendant Starbucks Corporation, erroneously sued as Starbucks Coffee Company recover of the Plaintiff Erica Hernandez its costs of action, taxed in the sum of $12,971.79.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
