Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. GARBRICK, 2:02-CR-00459 WBS (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170309a62 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2017
Summary: WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because in Case No. 2:17-MC-00035 MCE DB, the United States seeks a writ of garnishment to enforce the unpaid restitution ordered against defendant W. Richard Garbrick in Case No. 2:02-CR-00459 WBS. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be co
More

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because in Case No. 2:17-MC-00035 MCE DB, the United States seeks a writ of garnishment to enforce the unpaid restitution ordered against defendant W. Richard Garbrick in Case No. 2:02-CR-00459 WBS. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated United States v. Garbrick, No. 2:02-CR-00459 WBS, and United States v. Garbrick, No. 2:17-MC-00035 MCE DB, be, and the same hereby are, deemed related. The case denominated United States v. Garbrick, Case No. 2:17-MC-00035 MCE DB, shall be reassigned to the Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as United States v. Garbrick, No. 2:17-MC-00035 WBS DB.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to compensate for this reassignment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer