Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Delamora v. Baughman, 2:17-cv-0871-MCE-EFB P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180726951 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jul. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453 , 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. 3006A; see also,
More

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 20) is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is, however, granted an extension of time within which to file his objections to the July 3, 2018 findings and recommendations. Petitioner's objections, if any, shall be filed within thirty (30) days.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer