United States v. Zafret, SA 19-MJ-879. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191202567
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's application for review of the magistrate judge's order setting conditions of release. The Court has read and considered the government's memorandum in support of detention and the pretrial services report, and heard argument from the parties. The Court hereby finds that no condition or combination of conditions can reasonably assure the safety of
Summary: ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's application for review of the magistrate judge's order setting conditions of release. The Court has read and considered the government's memorandum in support of detention and the pretrial services report, and heard argument from the parties. The Court hereby finds that no condition or combination of conditions can reasonably assure the safety of a..
More
ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the government's application for review of the magistrate judge's order setting conditions of release. The Court has read and considered the government's memorandum in support of detention and the pretrial services report, and heard argument from the parties.
The Court hereby finds that no condition or combination of conditions can reasonably assure the safety of any person or the community. The Court bases this conclusion on the following: (1) the pending criminal complaint, which alleges defendant performed two check cashing store robberies, one of which involved, at the least, a replica firearm; (2) a pending state court criminal case involving four convenience store robberies, at least one of which involved the use of a loaded revolver; (3) a pending state court criminal case for vehicular manslaughter; and (4) all other reasons stated on the record during the hearing.
Defendant is therefore ordered detained pending trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
