U.S. v. MARGHEIM, 10-cr-00326-17. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150710887
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID M. EBEL , District Judge . These matters come before the Court on Defendant Terry Margheim's pleading (Docs. 2557, 2569) asking about the status of his motion for 28 U.S.C. 2255 relief and his motion for appointment of counsel. In response, the Court states that it has received Margheim's 2255 motion, the Government's response to that motion, and Margheim's reply (Docs. 2539, 2551, 2552). The Court will rule on the 2255 motion in due course. The Court has also received, an
Summary: ORDER DAVID M. EBEL , District Judge . These matters come before the Court on Defendant Terry Margheim's pleading (Docs. 2557, 2569) asking about the status of his motion for 28 U.S.C. 2255 relief and his motion for appointment of counsel. In response, the Court states that it has received Margheim's 2255 motion, the Government's response to that motion, and Margheim's reply (Docs. 2539, 2551, 2552). The Court will rule on the 2255 motion in due course. The Court has also received, and..
More
ORDER
DAVID M. EBEL, District Judge.
These matters come before the Court on Defendant Terry Margheim's pleading (Docs. 2557, 2569) asking about the status of his motion for 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief and his motion for appointment of counsel. In response, the Court states that it has received Margheim's § 2255 motion, the Government's response to that motion, and Margheim's reply (Docs. 2539, 2551, 2552). The Court will rule on the § 2255 motion in due course. The Court has also received, and will address in due course, Margheim's motions for appointment of counsel (Docs. 2558, 2559), as well as his motion to hold in abeyance his motion to reduce his sentence (Docs. 2555, 2556).
Source: Leagle
