Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WILLIAMS v. U.S., 1:15-cv-01680-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170629b13 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 23) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 26, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 23.) Both parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 , 1506 (9th Cir. 1995
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

(ECF No. 23)

On June 26, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 23.) Both parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer