Christie S. v. Saul, 2:18-cv-397. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20190913g60
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT J. SHELBY , District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On August 27, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying Plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II o
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT J. SHELBY , District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On August 27, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying Plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT J. SHELBY, District Judge.
The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B),1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019.2 On August 27, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation.3 Judge Romero recommends the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying Plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be affirmed.4 Neither party objects to Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, so the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.5
Having carefully considered Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error. The court therefore ADOPTS Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation6 and DENIES Plaintiff's appeal.7 The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
FootNotes
1. Dkt. 14.
2. Dkt. 18.
3. Dkt. 27.
4. Id. at 9.
5. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court for N. Dist. of Cal., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879).
6. Dkt. 27.
7. Dkt. 3.
Source: Leagle
