Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vigdor v. Karam, 4:18-cv-04573-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181011a95 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2 of the Northern District of California, the parties to this lawsuit Plaintiffs Dan Vigdor and Stephen Bradway ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Andrew Karam, Anthony Soohoo and Merrilee Soohoo Revocable Trust, John and Isabelle Krystynak 2011 Family Trust, Adam and Jaclyn Foroughi 2011 Family Trust, Vandana Shah and Praful Shah Revocable Living Trust,
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2 of the Northern District of California, the parties to this lawsuit Plaintiffs Dan Vigdor and Stephen Bradway ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Andrew Karam, Anthony Soohoo and Merrilee Soohoo Revocable Trust, John and Isabelle Krystynak 2011 Family Trust, Adam and Jaclyn Foroughi 2011 Family Trust, Vandana Shah and Praful Shah Revocable Living Trust, 500 Startups L.P., and Rose Partners LLC and Karl Jacob III ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS, the initial case management conference in this matter is currently set for November 6, 2018;

WHEREAS, Defendants have noticed their motion to dismiss for December 6, 2018;

WHEREAS, the parties to this action agree that continuing the initial case management conference until the December 6, 2018 hearing would promote judicial economy and conserve party resources;

WHEREAS, the parties to this action have not previously modified timelines in this case; and

WHEREAS, the Court has not yet set a schedule for this case within the meaning of Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(3);

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE to and request that the Court CONTINUE the November 6, 2018 case management conference to December 6, 2018 when all counsel in this and the related action will be present in Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

*Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, the attorney filing this document attests that he has obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all other signatories.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer