CHAPMAN v. CITY OF LINCOLN, 2:15-CV-00270-MCE-EFB (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160610a35
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2016
Summary: 2 nd JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST-AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , Magistrate Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN, may have until June 23, 2016, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First-Amended Complaint. Parties are attempting to draft an operative complaint, so the above-mentioned related cases may be consolidated into one matter. This extension exceeds the twenty-eight (28) da
Summary: 2 nd JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST-AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , Magistrate Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN, may have until June 23, 2016, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First-Amended Complaint. Parties are attempting to draft an operative complaint, so the above-mentioned related cases may be consolidated into one matter. This extension exceeds the twenty-eight (28) day..
More
2nd JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST-AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Magistrate Judge.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant CITY OF LINCOLN, may have until June 23, 2016, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First-Amended Complaint. Parties are attempting to draft an operative complaint, so the above-mentioned related cases may be consolidated into one matter. This extension exceeds the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a) and therefore approval of this stipulation by the court is necessary. This is the second stipulation for an extension of time between the parties.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
