Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Made3, LLC v. HALO COUTURE, LLC, 5:17-cv-01852-MLH (SHKx). (2017)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20171109b59 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE [Doc. No. 11.] MARILYN L. HUFF , District Judge . On September 11, 2017, Plaintiff Made3, LLC filed a complaint for patent infringement against Defendant Halo Couture, LLC. (Doc. No. 1.) Prior to Defendant filing an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on November 6, 2017. (Doc. No. 11.) In the notice, Plaint
More

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

[Doc. No. 11.]

On September 11, 2017, Plaintiff Made3, LLC filed a complaint for patent infringement against Defendant Halo Couture, LLC. (Doc. No. 1.) Prior to Defendant filing an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on November 6, 2017. (Doc. No. 11.) In the notice, Plaintiff states that the parties have entered into a confidential settlement agreement to resolve the action and requests that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the settlement agreement. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court dismisses the action with prejudice and directs the Clerk to close the case. The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties and the settlement agreement to enforce the provisions of the settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer