Vladamua, LLC v. Make up for Ever, S.A., CV 18-128-GW(JCx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180817c13
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . ORDER The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Make Up For Ever, S.A. and Make Up For Ever LLC in the First Amended Complaint, and all claims previously brought against LVMH Mo t Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.E. and LVMH Mo t Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear i
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . ORDER The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Make Up For Ever, S.A. and Make Up For Ever LLC in the First Amended Complaint, and all claims previously brought against LVMH Mo t Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.E. and LVMH Mo t Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear it..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Make Up For Ever, S.A. and Make Up For Ever LLC in the First Amended Complaint, and all claims previously brought against LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.E. and LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
