Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Subpoena Edward Dean for Trial (Doc. 72) and Defendant Dean's response thereto (Doc. 73). A review of the record reveals that Defendant Dean is the Sheriff of Marion County, Florida and is being sued here in his official capacity. (Doc. 1 5). 1 Exceptional circumstances must exist before a high-ranking government official may be compelled to testify for actions allegedly taken while op
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Subpoena Edward Dean for Trial (Doc. 72) and Defendant Dean's response thereto (Doc. 73). A review of the record reveals that Defendant Dean is the Sheriff of Marion County, Florida and is being sued here in his official capacity. (Doc. 1 5). 1 Exceptional circumstances must exist before a high-ranking government official may be compelled to testify for actions allegedly taken while ope..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Subpoena Edward Dean for Trial (Doc. 72) and Defendant Dean's response thereto (Doc. 73). A review of the record reveals that Defendant Dean is the Sheriff of Marion County, Florida and is being sued here in his official capacity. (Doc. 1 ¶ 5).1
Exceptional circumstances must exist before a high-ranking government official may be compelled to testify for actions allegedly taken while operating in his official capacity. See Slone v. Sheriff Grady Judd, No. 8:09-cv-1175-T-27TGW, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48039, at *4-5 (M.D. Fla. April 26, 2011) (The court determined that the sheriff was "an independent constitutional officer and [was] elected to his position pursuant to the Florida Constitution . . . [and that a]s a high-ranking government official, he may not be called to testify about his reasons for taking official action `absent extraordinary circumstances.'"). Courts have found that exceptional circumstances exist where a sheriff has unique or personal knowledge about the case. See Rocker v. City of Ocala Florida, 355 F. App'x 312, 314-15 (11th Cir. 2009) ("The court granted the protective order on the condition that Rocker could depose the Sheriff upon establishing that he had unique knowledge about her case."); see also Slone, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48039, at *5-6 (the court determined that "Sheriff Judd [would] not be diverted from his duties to testify at trial" absent a showing by plaintiff that he had "personal knowledge about her case.").
In this case, Plaintiff seeks permission to subpoena the sheriff of Marion County to secure his appearance at trial. (Doc. 72). In support of her motion, Plaintiff reasserts her allegations against Defendant Dean and reproduces his responses to her requests for admissions, albeit with some inaccuracy. (Id.). Without proffering any evidence, Plaintiff maintains that Defendant Dean "has personal knowledge regarding material facts in this case, including but not limited to" the items listed in his responses to the requests for admissions. (Id. ¶ 3) This conclusory assertion, without more, is insufficient to satisfy the "exceptional circumstances" test that governs this type of subpoena request. Slone, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48039, at *4-6; Rocker, 355 F. App'x at 314-15.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
