ORDER

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is defendants AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc. dba 500FastCash, SFS, Inc. dba OneClickCash, Tribal Financial Services, dba Ameriloan, United Cash Loans, US Fast Cash, Miami Nation Enterprises, AMG Capital Management, LLC, Level 5 Motorsports, LeadFlash Consulting LLC, Blackcreek Capital Corporation, Broadmoor Capital Partners, Scott A. Tucker, and Blaine A. Tucker's (hereinafter "moving defendants") Agreed Motion For Extension of Time For Defendants To Respond To The Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Equitable Relief. (#12). Defendant Robert D. Campbell and defendants The Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir, Esq. filed Joinders thereto (#14 and #17).

Also before the court is defendant Partner Weekly, LLC's (hereinafter "PW") Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time To Respond To Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Equitable Relief. (#16). 0

Background

Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (hereinafter "FTC") filed its complaint against several defendants on April 2, 2012, asserting violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), violations of TILA and Regulation Z, and violations of EFTA and Regulation E. (#1). On April 2, 2012, plaintiff also filed a motion for preliminary injunction against all defendants. (#4). On April 4, 2012, summons were issued as to all defendants. (#9). According to moving defendants' motion for extension, moving defendants accepted service on April 4, 2012. (#12). On April 11, 2012, moving defendants filed the present motion for extension of time. Id. Defendant Campbell filed his joinder on April 12, 2012 (#14), and defendant PW filed its motion for extension on April 13, 2012 (#16). Defendants The Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir filed their joinder on April 13, 2012. (#17). Proof of service has not been filed as to any defendants.

Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleading

A. Moving Defendants' Motion For Extension (#12)

Moving defendants ask this court to extend the time for moving defendant to respond to the FTC's motion for preliminary injunction and other equitable relief (#4) until May 4, 2012. (#12). Moving defendants accepted service on April 4, 2012, and their response to the motion for preliminary injunction is due on April 18, 2012. Id. Moving defendants assert that they "conferred with [p]laintiff about the due date," and that the parties have agreed to ask this court for the extension. Id. Moving defendants argue that the extension is appropriate because counsel is newly retained and was not previously involved in the matter, extra time is needed to review the complex and lengthy filings in this action, and the parties are interested in meeting in advance to explore alternatives to litigation. Id.

B. Joinders (#14 and #17)

In defendant Campbell's joinder to the moving defendants' motion, he asserts that he joins the request for extension of time to respond to the motion for preliminary injunction. (#14). Defendant Campbell does not state that he accepted service on April 4, 2012, but asserts that he adopts the moving defendants' arguments as his own and requests to be permitted to file a responsive pleading by May 4, 2012. Id. In defendants The Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir's joinder, they join the arguments presented by the moving defendants, and assert that good cause exists to grant the extension. (#17).

C. Defendant Partner Weekly, LLC's Motion For Extension (#16)

Defendant PW was served on April 4, 2012, and its responsive pleading to the motion for preliminary injunction is due on April 18, 2012. (#16). Defendant PW asserts that it joins in moving defendants' motion for extension (#12), and that plaintiff has indicated that it does not object to the requested extension. Id. Defendant PW lists the same reasons as the moving defendants do for seeking the extension. Id. Defendant PW also asserts that it does not believe that it is a proper defendant in this action, and that the extension will provide counsel the ability to evaluate the appropriate way to resolve the issue. Id.

Discussion

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the court may grant an extension of time where good cause exists. Based on the representations of defendants as outlined above, and the fact that plaintiff FTC agreed to the extension, the court finds that good cause exists to extend the time in which defendants have to respond to the motion for preliminary injunction (#4) until May 4, 2012. Defendants Don E. Brady, Troy L. LittleAxe, Park 269 LLC, and Kim C. Tucker have not joined moving defendants motion (#12) or filed a separate motion for extension. Therefore, the extension granted herein does not apply to those defendants1.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc. dba 500FastCash, SFS, Inc. dba One Click Cash, Tribal Financial Services, dba Ameriloan, United Cash Loans, US Fast Cash, Miami Nation Enterprises, AMG Capital Management, LLC, Level 5 Motorsports, LeadFlash Consulting LLC, Blackcreek Capital Corporation, Broadmoor Capital Partners, Scott A. Tucker, and Blaine A. Tucker's Agreed Motion For Extension of Time For Defendants To Respond To The Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (#12) and Defendant Partner Weekly, LLC's Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time To Respond To Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (#16) are GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendants, excluding Don E. Brady, Troy L. LittleAxe, Park 269 LLC, and Kim C. Tucker, shall have up to and including May 4, 2012, to file a response to plaintiff FTC's Motion For Preliminary Injunction. (#4).