NORMAN v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 13-cv-01643-PAB-CBS. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20141121b51
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Objections to Plaintiffs' Initial Designation of Deposition Testimony of Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's 30(b)(6) Representative Edwin Joe Lucero [Docket No. 53]. The Court rules as follows: Item # Testimony Objection Ruling 1 6:24-10:6 Beyond the
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Objections to Plaintiffs' Initial Designation of Deposition Testimony of Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's 30(b)(6) Representative Edwin Joe Lucero [Docket No. 53]. The Court rules as follows: Item # Testimony Objection Ruling 1 6:24-10:6 Beyond the S..
More
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Objections to Plaintiffs' Initial Designation of Deposition Testimony of Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's 30(b)(6) Representative Edwin Joe Lucero [Docket No. 53].
The Court rules as follows:
Item # Testimony Objection Ruling
1 6:24-10:6 Beyond the Scope of the As to the "beyond the scope"
30(b)(6) Notice; F.R.E. objection, overruled. The
402 and F.R.E. 403 remaining objections are
overruled as well.
2 10:7-11:14 F.R.E. 402 and F.R.E. Overruled.
403
3 16:20-17:15 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled. The information
30(b)(6) Notice; F.R.E. the deponent reviewed in
402 and F.R.E. 403. preparation for the deposition
Questions are asking Mr. is germane to his Rule
Lucero about personal his 30(b)(6) testimony.
individual knowledge and
actions.
4 20:16-23:18 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative and
factually inaccurate
20:18-19. F.R.E. 402 and
F.R.E. 403. If the Court is
going to allow the
testimony over the
objection, Defendant
counter designates
20:14-15.
5 23:19-24:21 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
6 24:22-25:3 Beyond the Scope of the Sustained on grounds that
30(b)(6) Notice; the question was withdrawn
Argumentative; F.R.E. and therefore is not itself
402 and F.R.E. 403. relevant.
Counsel withdrew the
question at 25:3.
7 25:4-26:13 Beyond the Scope of the Sustained as irrelevant
30(b)(6) Notice; colloquy by counsel.
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
8 26:14-34:11 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative and
F.R.E. 402 and F.R.E.
403. Plaintiffs' counsel is
asking the personal
opinions of the deponent.
If the Court is going to
allow the testimony over
the objection, Defendant
counter designates
27:25-28:17; 34:12-14
9 38:24-40:6 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403. If the
Court is going to allow the
testimony over the
objection, Defendant
counter designates 38:8-12
and 14-21; 40:6-14.
10 41:1-47:1 Beyond the Scope of the As to 43:24-44:7, sustained
30(b)(6) Notice; as irrelevant. Otherwise,
Argumentative; F.R.E. overruled.
402 and F.R.E. 403
11 62:5-63:23; Beyond the Scope of the As to 62:5-62:13, sustained
64:12-68:7 30(b)(6) Notice; as argumentative.
Argumentative; F.R.E. Otherwise, overruled.
402 and F.R.E. 403
12 69:6-71:7 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403
13 77:20-22; 78:22 Duplicative of the Sustained.
following question and
answer starting at 78:23.
14 80:5-81:12 Beyond the Scope of the As to 80:24-25, stricken as
30(b)(6) Notice; improper statement of
Argumentative; F.R.E. counsel. Otherwise,
402 and F.R.E. 403 overruled.
15 82:3-21 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403
16 83:16-84:1 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403. If the
Court is going to allow the
testimony over the
objection, Defendant
counter designates 84:2-6
and 8-17.
17 84:19-85:6 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
18 85:7-86:19 Speculation Overruled.
19 86:20-87:9 Beyond the Scope of the Sustained. Lack of
30(b)(6) Notice; foundation and calls for
Foundation and speculation.
Speculation. If the Court
is going to allow the
testimony over the
objection, Defendant
counter designates
87:10-19.
20 88:21-89:11 Beyond the Scope of the Sustained as beyond the
30(b)(6) Notice; scope of the Rule 30(b)(6)
Argumentative; F.R.E. notice and calls for
402 and F.R.E. 403. Mr. speculation.
Lucero is being asked to
comment on Plaintiff's
credibility.
21 90:1-91:20 F.R.E. 802 Overruled.
22 91:21-93:2 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
23 93:3-94:4 Argumentative; F.R.E. Overruled.
403 and F.R.E. 802 for
93:13-15.
24 94:5-98:2 Beyond the Scope of the As to 95:19-96:22, sustained
30(b)(6) Notice; as argumentative and asked
Argumentative; F.R.E. and answered. Otherwise,
402 and F.R.E. 403. overruled.
25 98:3-17 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
26 98:18-99:3 Plaintiffs' counsel Sustained.
withdrew at 99:7-9
27 100:6-102:22 Beyond the Scope of the As to 100:14-101:15,
30(b)(6) Notice; sustained as argumentative.
Argumentative; F.R.E. Otherwise, overruled.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
28 103:19-104:21 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
29 110:1-4 F.R.E. 402 and F.R.E. Sustained. Irrelevant.
403.
30 111:9-112:2 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403.
31 112:8-112:21 Beyond the Scope of the Overruled.
30(b)(6) Notice;
Argumentative; F.R.E.
402 and F.R.E. 403. If the
Court is going to allow the
testimony over the
objection, Defendant
counter designates
112:23.
Source: Leagle
