Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Capital One, National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-00604-RFB-VCF (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180117b88 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court are the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 23) and Motion to Extend Time and to File Response to Counterclaim (ECF No. 24) filed in 2:17-cv-00916-KJD-VCF. Oppositions were due by January 12, 2018. Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of t
More

ORDER

Before the Court are the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 23) and Motion to Extend Time and to File Response to Counterclaim (ECF No. 24) filed in 2:17-cv-00916-KJD-VCF. Oppositions were due by January 12, 2018.

Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. To date, no opposition has been filed. Here, it would seem as though the parties have consented the granting of the instant motions.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 23) and Motion to Extend Time and to File Response to Counterclaim (ECF No. 24) are GRANTED.

The Amended Complaint and Response to the Counterclaim must be filed on or before January 24, 2018.

The hearing scheduled for January 23, 2018 at 11:00 AM is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically (ECF No. 62) is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer