Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HURON CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC v. PHYSIOTHERAPY HOLDINGS, INC., 13-12965 (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Delaware Number: infdco20141121b67 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: RECOMMENDATION CHRISTOPHER J. BURKE, District Judge. At Wilmington this 20th day of November, 2014. WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, a teleconference was held on July 23, 2014 for an initial review and discussion with counsel to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter; WHEREAS, as a result of that teleconference, mediation occurred on
More

RECOMMENDATION

CHRISTOPHER J. BURKE, District Judge.

At Wilmington this 20th day of November, 2014.

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) of the Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District dated September 11, 2012, a teleconference was held on July 23, 2014 for an initial review and discussion with counsel to determine the appropriateness of mediation in this matter;

WHEREAS, as a result of that teleconference, mediation occurred on September 18, 2014;

WHEREAS, no resolution of this matter occurred at the mediation, nor in further mediation efforts by the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, and further mediation at this stage would not be a productive exercise, a worthwhile use of judicial resources nor warrant the expense of the process.

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, pursuant to paragraph 2(a) Procedures to Govern Mediation of Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court for this District and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter be withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation and proceed through the appellate process of this Court. The parties have advised they are in agreement with this Recommendation and that there will be no objections filed to it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B), FED. R. Crv. P. 72(a) and D. DEL. LR 72.1.

The parties request that a briefing schedule be entered by the Court such that Appellant's opening brief will be due 21 days after entry of the Scheduling Order, that Appellees' response will be due 35 days after filing of Appellant's brief, and Appellants' reply will be due 21 days after filing of Appellees' brief.

Local counsel are obligated to inform out-of-state counsel of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer