Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. NGUYEN, 16-CV-03543-LHK. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160630b11 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JOHNSON CLAIM RAISED IN SECTION 2255 MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 1 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . Before the court is the motion of Defendant Tinh Huy Nguyen ("movant") for an order under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence on the ground that his sentence has been rendered invalid by the Supreme Court's holding in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). This Johnson claim appears colorable under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and merits an answer
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JOHNSON CLAIM RAISED IN SECTION 2255 MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 1

Before the court is the motion of Defendant Tinh Huy Nguyen ("movant") for an order under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence on the ground that his sentence has been rendered invalid by the Supreme Court's holding in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). This Johnson claim appears colorable under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and merits an answer from the government.

The following deadlines will apply, unless the parties submit a stipulation and order for a shorter briefing schedule: (1) within 75 days after the § 2255 motion was filed, the government shall file an opposition conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, showing cause why the court should not "vacate, set aside or correct the sentence" being served by movant; (2) movant shall file a reply brief 45 days after the opposition is filed. Thereafter, the matter will be deemed submitted on the papers, unless the court orders otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer