DANIELS v. COLVIN, 13-cv-02460-AP. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140416904
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Joseph A. Whitcompb, Esq. Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group 1391 Speer Boulevard, Suite 705 Denver, Colorado 80204 303-534-1954 303-534-1949 (facsimile) Joe@RMDLG.com For Defendant: Christina J. Valerio Assistant Regional Counsel Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel Region VIII 1961 Stout, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294 Telep
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Joseph A. Whitcompb, Esq. Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group 1391 Speer Boulevard, Suite 705 Denver, Colorado 80204 303-534-1954 303-534-1949 (facsimile) Joe@RMDLG.com For Defendant: Christina J. Valerio Assistant Regional Counsel Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel Region VIII 1961 Stout, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294 Teleph..
More
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Whitcompb, Esq.
Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group
1391 Speer Boulevard, Suite 705
Denver, Colorado 80204
303-534-1954
303-534-1949 (facsimile)
Joe@RMDLG.com
For Defendant:
Christina J. Valerio
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel
Region VIII
1961 Stout, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
Telephone: (303) 844-7348
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770
Christina.valerio@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: September 10, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 27, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 4, 2014
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of her knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties agreed to the following schedule:
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 12, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: June 11, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 26, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
Source: Leagle
