ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (Doc. # 96), wherein she recommends that this Court grant Defendant Megan J. Brennan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 75) and deny Plaintiff Robert E. Goodson's response, titled Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Response") (Doc. # 83). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 96 at 30.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Recommendation have been filed. "[T]he district court is accorded considerable discretion with respect to the treatment of unchallenged magistrate reports. In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991).

After reviewing the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mix and all relevant pleadings and legal authority, the Court is satisfied that the Recommendation is sound and not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 96) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 75) is GRANTED, and that all claims in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent Plaintiff seeks summary judgment in his favor in his Response (Doc. # 83), Plaintiff's request is DENIED.