Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Macias, 2:15-CR-0125 GEB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160418593 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER (PROPOSED) CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed between defendants, Benjamin Macias and Sergio Ambriz, and plaintiff, United States of America, that the status conference scheduled for April 15, 2016, may be continued to June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. Mr. Macias and Mr. Ambriz continue to review discovery, including audio and video surveillance recordings. Counsel for Mr. Ambriz also
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER (PROPOSED) CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

It is hereby stipulated and agreed between defendants, Benjamin Macias and Sergio Ambriz, and plaintiff, United States of America, that the status conference scheduled for April 15, 2016, may be continued to June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.

Mr. Macias and Mr. Ambriz continue to review discovery, including audio and video surveillance recordings. Counsel for Mr. Ambriz also seeks time to consult with an immigration expert about records received from Citizenship and Immigration Services. That consultation is necessary to evaluate resolution of the case.

Accordingly, the parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through June 17, 2016, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (b)(iv), to afford the parties adequate time for effective preparation and to assure continuity of counsel. The parties agree that the ends of justice served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and of Mr. Macias and of Mr. Ambriz in a speedy trial and ask the Court to so find.

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney Dated: April 13, 2016 /s/ T. Zindel for P. Hemesath PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference scheduled for April 15 is continued to June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. The court finds that a continuance is necessary for the reasons stated above and that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Time is therefore excluded from the date of this order through June 17, 2016, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer