Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WOODSTOCK v. SHAFFER, 15-cv-00041-REB-KMT. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20160310939 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on "Plaintiff's Request to Compell (sic) Documents from Shaffer and Palmer" [Doc. No. 115] filed January 6, 2016. "Defendant Shaffer and Palmer's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel" [Doc. No. 123] was filed on January 11, 2016. Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendants Shaffer and Palmer's compliance with three Requests for Production of Documents: RFP #1, documents concerning inmate requests, grievances and app
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on "Plaintiff's Request to Compell (sic) Documents from Shaffer and Palmer" [Doc. No. 115] filed January 6, 2016. "Defendant Shaffer and Palmer's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel" [Doc. No. 123] was filed on January 11, 2016.

Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendants Shaffer and Palmer's compliance with three Requests for Production of Documents: RFP #1, documents concerning inmate requests, grievances and appeals involving kosher diets at the Larimer County Jail since December 1, 2013; RFP #4, Larimer County's kosher diet policies, guidelines, directives and instructions to staff; and, RFP#7, portions of the contract between Larimer County and Aramark concerning kosher diets.

Defendants have responded that as to RFP #1, the request involves the files of 116 inmates and Larimer County agrees to provide documents as requested. As to RFP #4, Defendants respond that they have provided all documents in their possession, custody and control, but since the meals are prepared by Aramark, it is Aramark, though Defendant Jones, which might have the more particularized documentation. And, as to RFP #7, Defendants state that the entire contract between Larimer County and Aramark has been provided.

The court ORDERS, therefore, that the "Plaintiff's Request to Compell (sic) Documents from Shaffer and Palmer" [Doc. No. 115] is DENIED as moot. The motion hearing set for March 17, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer