Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cares v. County of San Benito, 4:18-cv-07651-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191210a92 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO `DEFENDANT'S BRIEF RE: DISMISSAL PENDING PLAINTIFF'S CRIMINAL CASE'; ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff has, for two weeks, considered and researched his response to defendant's 11/22/19 filing, and feels the need for more time to prepare his response. Therefore, Plaintiff, who is without counsel, respectfully requests that the Court allow him as much time to prepare his response as defendants' counsel had to prepare th
More

MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO RESPOND TO `DEFENDANT'S BRIEF RE: DISMISSAL PENDING PLAINTIFF'S CRIMINAL CASE'; ORDER

Plaintiff has, for two weeks, considered and researched his response to defendant's 11/22/19 filing, and feels the need for more time to prepare his response. Therefore, Plaintiff, who is without counsel, respectfully requests that the Court allow him as much time to prepare his response as defendants' counsel had to prepare their brief, which would equate to December 22, 2019.

While Plaintiff would have been happy to file his response by December 6, if he felt he could adequately do so in that time, considering the lack of urgency, which the Court acknowledged at the last hearing when deciding to afford defendants' counsel 30 days, and that plaintiff feels the need for more time, it would seem reasonable to grant this extension.

/S/ THOMAS JEFFERSON CARES Long Beach, CA IN PRO PER

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERD that Plaintiff, Thomas Jefferson Cares (in pro per), may have until December 22, 2019 to file his reply to Defendant's brief, RE: Dismissal Pending Plaintiff's Criminal Case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer