NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, District Judge.
Based on the evidence presented at the fairness hearing and upon a review of the submissions of the parties, the following determinations are made:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this lawsuit, Plaintiff, Settlement Class Members, and Coast.
2. Consistent with the parties' stipulations and this Court's Preliminary Approval Order, [ECF 92], this action satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Rule 23(a) and (b); to wit: the class, as defined in the Settlement Agreement (the "Class"), is so numerous that joinder of all members is not practicable; there are questions of law and fact common to the Class; the claims of the Class Representative are typical of the claims of the Class; and the Class Representative will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class. Questions of law and fact common to the members of the Class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members. These questions include whether Coast violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692a, et seq., by calculating reasonable and affordable payments for rehabilitation of defaulted federal FFELP and Direct Loans, in a manner that Plaintiff contends violated the FDCPA. The treatment of this matter as a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this action.
3. Previously, this Court approved a form of notice for mailing to the Settlement Class and ordered its dissemination. According to the parties' submissions, this approved form of notice was sent by first class mail to approximately 2,620 Settlement Class members by Dahl Administration, the third-party settlement administrator. A total of 503 envelopes was returned by the United States Postal Service, four of which were returned with forwarding addresses and re-mailed. As such, notice to the Class required by Rule 23(e) has been mailed and provided in accordance with the Court's Preliminary Approval Order, and in an adequate and sufficient manner, constituting the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and satisfying Rule 23(e) and due process.
4. Defendant has timely filed notification of this settlement with the appropriate federal officials pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1715. This Court has reviewed such notification and accompanying materials, and finds that the Defendant's notification complies fully with the applicable requirements of CAFA.
5. The Settlement Agreement was reached at as a result of arms-length negotiations conducted in good faith by counsel for the parties, and is supported by the class representative.
6. The settlement, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, is fair, reasonable and adequate to the members of the Class in light of the complexity, expense, duration of litigation, and the risks involved in establishing liability, damages and maintaining the class action through trial and appeal.
7. The relief provided under the settlement constitutes fair value given in exchange for the releases of claims set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
8. No class members have excluded themselves from the Class in accordance with the provisions of the Preliminary Approval Order or have filed any objections.
Accordingly, it is
1. This action is finally certified as a class action against Coast Professional Inc., on behalf of a Class defined as follows:
2. The Settlement Agreement submitted by the parties is finally approved pursuant to Rule 23(e) as fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class. The parties are directed to consummate the Settlement Agreement in accordance with its terms.
3. In addition, Class Counsel's litigation expenses and attorneys' fees are approved in the amount of $185,000.00. This Court also approves a payment to the Class Representative, Sheena Alexander, in the amount of $2,000.00 as consideration of her individual claims against Defendant and for the valuable service she performed for and on behalf of the Class.
4. As agreed by the parties in the Settlement Agreement, upon the Effective Date, as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement, Coast shall make the following payments:
In addition, the Parties grant the following releases:
5. The terms of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated into this Order.
6. Consistent with the parties' agreement, within thirty (30) days following the last void date of the Settlement Class members' checks, any uncashed checks or undistributed funds will be paid by Dahl Administration, on behalf of Coast, to the following cy pres recipient: Clarifi, 1608 Walnut Street, 10
7. This Order constitutes a Final Judgment and Dismissal without prejudice of the claims in this action.
8. After all money has been distributed from the Class Recovery and no later than thirty (30) days after the Void Date, Coast shall file a notice certifying that the terms of the Settlement Agreement have been fully complied with and shall provide the Court with an accounting of how the money in the Class Fund was distributed.
9. In the absence of entry of any order to the contrary, ten (10) days after the filing of the notice contemplated in Paragraph 8 immediately above, the dismissal of the claims of Plaintiff and the Settlement Class shall be deemed terminated with prejudice and without costs, and shall be docketed by the Clerk as such upon request of either Party, without further order of this Court.
10. This Court finds, in accordance with Rule 54(b), that there is no just reason for delay of enforcement of this Order.
11. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement and this Order.
12. The Parties are hereby