Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bernal v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, 2:19-CV-00482-MCE-AC. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200313b31 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs William and Celia Bernal ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Couch, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Winkel, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Kennedy, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Sutter, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Chhlang, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Bliss, Sacra
More

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN

Plaintiffs William and Celia Bernal ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Couch, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Winkel, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Kennedy, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Sutter, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Chhlang, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Bliss, Sacramento County Sheriff Deputy Quackenbush ("Defendants") respectfully submit this proposed order in accordance with the stipulations contained in their Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (ECF No. 14). Due to uncertainties regarding the appearances of other parties to the case, Plaintiffs and Defendants believe it is necessary to extend various deadlines pertaining to discovery and dispositive motions. Specifically, the Plaintiffs and Defendants agree to the following deadlines in this case:

• Expert witness disclosure in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) shall be served on or before December 4, 2020. • Supplemental expert disclosure shall be served on or before 30 days after initial expert disclosure. • Expert discovery shall be completed 30 days after supplemental experts are disclosed. • Fact discovery shall be completed by October 23, 2020. • Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 180 days after the close of non-expert discovery.

Because this is jointly agreed to by Plaintiffs and Defendants, there is no risk of prejudice to any party in this case or bad faith.

Dated: March 5, 2020 LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP By: /s/Nicole M. Cahill VAN LONGYEAR NICOLE M. CAHILL Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento (erroneously sued as Sacramento County Sheriff's Department), Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones, Deputy Couch, Deputy Winkel, Deputy Kennedy, Deputy Sutter, Deputy Chhlang, Deputy Bliss, and Deputy Quackenbush Dated: March 5, 2020 BECKER LAW PRACTICE By: /s/Matthew Becker [authorized as of 3-5-20] MATTHEW BECKER Attorneys for Plaintiffs, William Bernal and Celia Bernal

ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The stipulation and request to extend various deadlines contained in Plaintiffs and Defendants' Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan (ECF No. 14) is granted; and

2. Expert witness disclosure in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (a)(2) shall be served on or before December 4, 2020;

3. Supplemental expert disclosure shall be served on or before 30 days after initial expert disclosure;

4. Expert discovery shall be completed 30 days after supplemental experts are disclosed;

5. Fact discovery shall be completed by October 23, 2020;

6. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 180 days after the close of non-expert discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer