Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stanley v. Navient Solutions, LLC, 2:18-cv-01913-TLN-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180815b05 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff Jeff Stanley ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC ("Defendant" or "NSL"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6(b) and Local Rule 144(a), do hereby agree and stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the above-captioned lawsuit on July 10,
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Plaintiff Jeff Stanley ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Navient Solutions, LLC ("Defendant" or "NSL"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6(b) and Local Rule 144(a), do hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the above-captioned lawsuit on July 10, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint on NSL on or about July 13, 2018,

WHEREAS, NSL is to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before August 3, 2018;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a twenty-eight (28) day extension for NSL to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, up to and including August 31, 2018. This extension will not affect any pending court dates or deadlines, nor will it prejudice any party herein.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that NSL is hereby granted an extension of time of twenty-eight (28) days within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, up to and including August 31, 2018.

FILER ATTESTATION

I, Renee Choy Ohlendorf, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer