U.S. v. CRILLEY, 14-cv-00969-WYD-KMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140609d45
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT Rowdy W. Roth, as holder of Tax Lien Sale Certificates of Purchase for county property taxes assessed against David W. Crilley for 2006 through 2012 have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6323(b)(6), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 200
Summary: ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT Rowdy W. Roth, as holder of Tax Lien Sale Certificates of Purchase for county property taxes assessed against David W. Crilley for 2006 through 2012 have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6323(b)(6), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 2000..
More
ORDER OF LIEN PRIORITY
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the United States of America and Defendant Rowdy W. Roth, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED THAT Rowdy W. Roth, as holder of Tax Lien Sale Certificates of Purchase for county property taxes assessed against David W. Crilley for 2006 through 2012 have priority, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6323(b)(6), over the United States' federal tax liens against David W. Crilley for the tax years 2000 through 2005. It is further
ORDERED THAT the parties to this Stipulation agree to bear their own costs and attorney's fees, excepting the costs incurred in selling the Subject Property, which are to be reimbursed from the proceeds of the sale of the Subject Property prior to satisfying the outstanding liens on the property. It is further
ORDERED THAT Rowdy W. Roth shall not be required to appear at future hearings in this litigation and shall be treated as a non-party for all purposes including discovery purposes, unless ordered by the Court.
Source: Leagle
