Spikes v. DaWood, 18cv275 JM (JLB). (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180522730
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE JEFFREY T. MILLER , District Judge . Plaintiff Karel Spikes moves the court to dismiss Defendant Rochelle S. Temkin with prejudice, and Plaintiff and Defendant Mike Dawood, dba AAA Smog & Repair Center (collectively, "the Parties") jointly move the court to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. (Doc. No. 3.) The Parties also request that the court "retain jurisdiction o
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE JEFFREY T. MILLER , District Judge . Plaintiff Karel Spikes moves the court to dismiss Defendant Rochelle S. Temkin with prejudice, and Plaintiff and Defendant Mike Dawood, dba AAA Smog & Repair Center (collectively, "the Parties") jointly move the court to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. (Doc. No. 3.) The Parties also request that the court "retain jurisdiction ov..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE
JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Karel Spikes moves the court to dismiss Defendant Rochelle S. Temkin with prejudice, and Plaintiff and Defendant Mike Dawood, dba AAA Smog & Repair Center (collectively, "the Parties") jointly move the court to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. (Doc. No. 3.) The Parties also request that the court "retain jurisdiction over all disputes between (among) the parties arising out of the settlement agreement including, but not limited to, interpretation and enforcement of the terms of the settlement agreement." (Id.)
The court grants the motion. Defendant Temkin is dismissed with prejudice. The court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice and directs the Clerk of Court to close the file. However, the court retains jurisdiction only with respect to enforcement of the settlement agreement, (Doc. No. 3, Exh. A.).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
