HENRY v. HALL, 3:13CV00146-JM-JJV (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141203757
Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment (D
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment (Do..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 80-83) are DENIED;
2. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 88, 92) are GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
