Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GUALEMI v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., 2:17-cv-263-FtM-38CM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20170627a20 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Action. (Doc. 9). The parties have agreed to arbitrate all claims in this case pursuant to the arbitration agreement in their Cardmember Agreement. The Court, therefore, will compel binding non-judicial arbitration and stay this case. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Joint Stipulation to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Action
More

OPINION AND ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Action. (Doc. 9). The parties have agreed to arbitrate all claims in this case pursuant to the arbitration agreement in their Cardmember Agreement. The Court, therefore, will compel binding non-judicial arbitration and stay this case.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Joint Stipulation to Arbitrate Claims and Stay Action (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff Daniel Gualemi's claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank must be submitted to final, binding arbitration. (2) All proceedings in this case are STAYED until notification by the parties that binding arbitration has been completed and that the stay is due to be lifted or the case is due to be dismissed. The parties shall notify the Court of such matters within five (5) days of the arbitration proceedings concluding. (3) The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report about the status of arbitration on or before September 25, 2017, and every ninety (90) days thereafter until the conclusion of arbitration. (4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add a stay flag.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer