Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CATES, 3:13-cv-00042-MMD-VPC. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140204d67 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES (Second Request) (And Proposed ORDER) VALERIE P. COOKE, Magistrate Judge. COMES now the plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendants, David A. Cates and Gisela J. Cates, and hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to the Order entered December 5, 2013 (Doc. 21), the deadline to file dispositive motions is February 3, 2014, and if no dispositive motion is filed, the pretrial order is due by March 5, 2014.
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES (Second Request) (And Proposed ORDER)

VALERIE P. COOKE, Magistrate Judge.

COMES now the plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendants, David A. Cates and Gisela J. Cates, and hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to the Order entered December 5, 2013 (Doc. 21), the deadline to file dispositive motions is February 3, 2014, and if no dispositive motion is filed, the pretrial order is due by March 5, 2014. The parties stipulate that these deadlines be continued until June 30, 2014, and July 30, 2014, respectively.

2. The parties are currently working towards a resolution of this matter. Defendants David and Gisela Cates are currently working with a lender (US Bank) to obtain financing in order to resolve this matter. In order to obtain funding, the lender required Mr. and Mrs. Cates to transfer the ownership of the property from the Cates Family Limited Partnership to David A. Cates and Gisela J. Cates. Mr. and Mrs. Cates have made the required transfer and recorded it with the Elko County Recorder. However, they now have to wait 120 days to resubmit their application to the lender.

3. On January 29, 2014, the undersigned counsel for the United States spoke with the lending officer with regard to this matter. The lending officer confirmed the information set forth above, in paragraph 2, and stated that she was continuing to work with Mr. and Mrs. Cates on obtaining the funding, and that once the application was resubmitted at the end of the 120 day period it may take up to 45 days to finalize.

3. In consideration of the above, the parties respectfully request that the current deadlines set forth in paragraph 1, above, be continued until June 30, 2014 and July 30, 2014, respectively, so that the parties may work to resolve this matter. The parties make this motion in good faith and for the purpose of attempting to resolve this matter, and not for purposes of delay.

WHEREFORE, the parties request that the dispositive motion deadline be continued until June 30, 2014, and if no dispositive motion is filed the pretrial order be due July 30, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer