Paine v. Ikea Holding US, Inc., 2:19-cv-00723-AB. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200124h28
Visitors: 37
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2020, it is ORDERED that IKEA's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED as to the disparate impact claims based on the Leadership Development Policy, Screening Interview Policy, and Diversity Policy (First Amended Complaint Count II, 145(c)-(e), ECF No. 17). The disparate impact claims based on th
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2020, it is ORDERED that IKEA's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED as to the disparate impact claims based on the Leadership Development Policy, Screening Interview Policy, and Diversity Policy (First Amended Complaint Count II, 145(c)-(e), ECF No. 17). The disparate impact claims based on the..
More
ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2020, it is ORDERED that IKEA's Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1. The motion is GRANTED as to the disparate impact claims based on the Leadership Development Policy, Screening Interview Policy, and Diversity Policy (First Amended Complaint Count II, ¶ 145(c)-(e), ECF No. 17). The disparate impact claims based on the Leadership Development Policy, Screening Interview Policy, and Diversity Policy of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to the Potential Policy and the Relocation Policy (First Amended Complaint Count II, ¶ 145(a), (b)). IKEA may raise its arguments again at the summary judgment stage.
Source: Leagle
