U.S. v. Tidwell, 1:14-CR-0122 AWI BAM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190503c64
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION FOR COPY OF SENTENCING TRANSCRIPT ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On July 6, 2015, Defendant pled guilty to violations of 21 U.S.C. 841 (manufacture of marijuana) and 18 U.S.C. 922 (felon in possession of a firearm). On October 26, 2015, Defendant was sentenced to a term of 96 months in prison. Judgment and commitment were entered on October 27, 2015. On April 29, 2019, Defendant filed a pro se motion for copies of the sentencing transcript. See Doc. No. 30
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION FOR COPY OF SENTENCING TRANSCRIPT ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On July 6, 2015, Defendant pled guilty to violations of 21 U.S.C. 841 (manufacture of marijuana) and 18 U.S.C. 922 (felon in possession of a firearm). On October 26, 2015, Defendant was sentenced to a term of 96 months in prison. Judgment and commitment were entered on October 27, 2015. On April 29, 2019, Defendant filed a pro se motion for copies of the sentencing transcript. See Doc. No. 30...
More
ORDER ON MOTION FOR COPY OF SENTENCING TRANSCRIPT
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
On July 6, 2015, Defendant pled guilty to violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (manufacture of marijuana) and 18 U.S.C. § 922 (felon in possession of a firearm). On October 26, 2015, Defendant was sentenced to a term of 96 months in prison. Judgment and commitment were entered on October 27, 2015.
On April 29, 2019, Defendant filed a pro se motion for copies of the sentencing transcript. See Doc. No. 30. However, the motion consists of a single sentence wherein Petitioner moves "to release and provide a copy of his Sentencing Transcripts." Doc. No. 30.1 Because there is no explanation given or authority cited for the request, there is no basis for the Court to grant Defendant's request.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for copies (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. To the extent that Defendant may believe that the sentencing transcript has been entered on the docket, the Court can confirm that no transcripts have been entered into the docket of this case.
Source: Leagle
