IBARRA v. FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWORK, 1:17-cv-00614-DAD-SAB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170628b34
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER SUBSTITUTING UNITED STATES AS DEFENDANT DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On June 5, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to substitute the United States of America as the named defendant in the action, in lieu of the other named defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 233. (Doc. No. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 233(g), the United States of America is hereby substituted as the sole named defendant in this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket accordingly
Summary: ORDER SUBSTITUTING UNITED STATES AS DEFENDANT DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On June 5, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to substitute the United States of America as the named defendant in the action, in lieu of the other named defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 233. (Doc. No. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 233(g), the United States of America is hereby substituted as the sole named defendant in this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket accordingly...
More
ORDER SUBSTITUTING UNITED STATES AS DEFENDANT
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
On June 5, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to substitute the United States of America as the named defendant in the action, in lieu of the other named defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 233. (Doc. No. 5.) Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 233(g), the United States of America is hereby substituted as the sole named defendant in this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
