Miller v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02613-JAD-BNW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191119b74
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2019
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal and/or Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 18, 19, 22] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Robert J. Miller brings this action for review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Social Security disability-insurance benefits. The magistrate judge has reviewed his case and recommends that I deny Miller's motion for reversal and/or remand 1 and grant the Commissioner's
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal and/or Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 18, 19, 22] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Robert J. Miller brings this action for review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Social Security disability-insurance benefits. The magistrate judge has reviewed his case and recommends that I deny Miller's motion for reversal and/or remand 1 and grant the Commissioner's ..
More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal and/or Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm
[ECF Nos. 18, 19, 22]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert J. Miller brings this action for review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Social Security disability-insurance benefits. The magistrate judge has reviewed his case and recommends that I deny Miller's motion for reversal and/or remand1 and grant the Commissioner's countermotion to affirm.2 The deadline to challenge that recommendation3 passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."4 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
• The magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 22] is ADOPTED in full;
• Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand [ECF No. 18] is DENIED;
• The Commissioner's Cross-motion to Affirm [ECF No. 19] is GRANTED; and
• The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT for the Defendant and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 18.
2. ECF No. 19.
3. ECF No. 22.
4. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
