Lexington Luminance LLC v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, 4:18-CV-301. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190329i92
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On March 13, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #26) that Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC's ("Lowe's") Motion to Dismiss, or Alternative
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMOS L. MAZZANT , District Judge . Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On March 13, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #26) that Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC's ("Lowe's") Motion to Dismiss, or Alternativel..
More
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AMOS L. MAZZANT, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 13, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #26) that Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC's ("Lowe's") Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, For a More Definite Statement (the "Motion") (Dkt. #7) be DENIED.
Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, Lowe's Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, For a More Definite Statement (Dkt. #7) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
