Ewing v. JS Holdings, LLC, 3:19-CV-1031-DMS-AHG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190815b57
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER: (1) RESETTING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, and (2) REGARDING EX PARTE APPLICATION [ECF No. 7] ALLISON H. GODDARD , Magistrate Judge . Previously, the Court vacated the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference due to a conflict with its calendar. See ECF No. 6. The Early Neutral Evaluation Conference is RESET on the calendar of Judge Goddard for September 3, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Regarding Plaintiff Anton Ewing's ("Plaintiff") ex parte application, the Court notes that
Summary: ORDER: (1) RESETTING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, and (2) REGARDING EX PARTE APPLICATION [ECF No. 7] ALLISON H. GODDARD , Magistrate Judge . Previously, the Court vacated the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference due to a conflict with its calendar. See ECF No. 6. The Early Neutral Evaluation Conference is RESET on the calendar of Judge Goddard for September 3, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Regarding Plaintiff Anton Ewing's ("Plaintiff") ex parte application, the Court notes that a..
More
ORDER:
(1) RESETTING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, and
(2) REGARDING EX PARTE APPLICATION
[ECF No. 7]
ALLISON H. GODDARD, Magistrate Judge.
Previously, the Court vacated the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference due to a conflict with its calendar. See ECF No. 6. The Early Neutral Evaluation Conference is RESET on the calendar of Judge Goddard for September 3, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
Regarding Plaintiff Anton Ewing's ("Plaintiff") ex parte application, the Court notes that all attorneys are bound by the rules of professional responsibility and the Court's order of civility. See CivLR 83.4. The Court declines to order further relief here. Additionally, regarding Plaintiff's objection to ex parte communications, the Court declines to issue an advisory opinion on the matter. See, e.g., Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 96 (1968) ("[T]he oldest and most consistent thread in the federal law of justiciability is that the federal courts will not give advisory opinions[.]"); Maldonado v. Morales, 556 F.3d 1037, 1044 (9th Cir. 2009) ("The role of the courts is neither to issue advisory opinions nor to declare rights in hypothetical cases, but to adjudicate live cases or controversies.").
The case will proceed as customary under the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
