MIHALICH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 14-cv-600-DRH-SCW. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140923a86
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2014
Summary: Order DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge. Now before the Court is Defendants' August 11, 2014 motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 2) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b). As of today's date, plaintiff has not responded to the motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion to dismiss. 1 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Court DISMISSE
Summary: Order DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge. Now before the Court is Defendants' August 11, 2014 motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 2) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b). As of today's date, plaintiff has not responded to the motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion to dismiss. 1 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Court DISMISSES..
More
Order
DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge.
Now before the Court is Defendants' August 11, 2014 motion to dismiss (Doc. 17) plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 2) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b).
As of today's date, plaintiff has not responded to the motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion to dismiss.1 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice plaintiff's complaint. Further, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment reflecting the same.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: "Failure to timely file a response to a motion may, in the Court's discretion, be considered an admission of the merits of the motion."
Source: Leagle
